This forced the company to seek a stay of the order on the grounds “that compliance with the order could harm it and harm consumers.”
“The requested suspension will allow Apple to protect consumers and safeguard its platform as the company resolves complex and rapidly evolving legal, technological and economic issues,” the original filing said.
But Gonzales Rogers refused, saying the motion “is fundamentally flawed.”
“Apple’s motion is based on a selective reading of the findings of this tribunal and ignores all of the findings that supported the injunction,” Rogers said.
“Consumers are quite used to linking an app to a web browser. Other than perhaps the time it takes to establish guidelines, Apple has provided no credible reason for the court to believe that the injunction would cause the declared devastation. “
She also said the inconvenience of having to open browsers and retype URLs only works to the benefit of tech giants.
Avoiding Apple’s in-app purchase system was the reason Fortnite was initially banned from the App Store, so the creators of Epic Games sued.
Bloomberg reports that pressure on Apple to reduce its commissions could ultimately affect revenues by $ 2 billion to $ 4 billion per year.
Epis also appealed after Gonzales Rogers found out Apple had not violated antitrust laws, with chief executive Tim Sweeney saying it could take five years and a trip to the US Supreme Court to be fully resolved. .
Apple has previously stated that Fortnite will not be allowed to return to the App Store until all legal procedures have been exhausted.